Teasing and BullyingHelping children deal with teasing and bullying: for parents, teachers and other adultsMarilyn Langevin
Definitions of bullying vary. At present there is not an agreed-upon definition and there are differences in how the term is used. However, the following are key elements of bullying:
A question sometimes asked is, "If the bullying occurred once, is it bullying?" Some will answer, "No, bullying includes only those aggressive acts that occur repeatedly." The key issue may not be the determination of whether or not to call the event one of "bullying". Rather, the key issue may be the victim's distress and what to do about it. Teens and adults have described one-time events of humiliation that occurred in school that changed their lives in terms of how they felt about themselves, how they thought about themselves and others, how they acted, and consequently how they functioned in relationships, academic life, and life in general. These events of humiliation took different forms: a malicious tease, a dirty trick, a malicious rumour. It is important that, as adults, we do not underestimate the potential emotional and psychological consequences of a one-time event. In some cases the event of bullying is truly one-time in terms of the actions of the child who bullied and the experience of the victim. In other cases it is a one-time event for the victim but not for the child who bullied or vice versa. As with repeated or chronic bullying, what to do requires an understanding of what has happened and consideration of possible options.
Bullying can take many forms and has been categorized in many ways:
Bullying can be also be direct or indirect, overt or very subtle, and it ranges in severity from mild to severe 6,7. There is overlap in the categorizations and again there is no one agreed-upon categorization. Although there are differences among schools, investigations using self-report questionnaires provide an estimation of the extent of bullying. 1,8,9,10,11,12,13 Estimates of victimization, bullying, and of those who bully and are victims vary. Victims:
Children who bully:
Victims/bullies:
In contrast to Olweus,1 who asserted that children with differences were not bullied more than those without differences, our research indicated that children who stutter are bullied more frequently than other children. It was found that: 14
The frequency data reported above are in accord with those reported in a retrospective study of adults who stutter.15 And, like children who don't stutter, those who do stutter suffer short- and long-term effects of bullying.15 What are the consequences of being bullied? Bullying can have short-term and long-term psychological impact.8,15,16,17
For children who stutter, the usual consequences are made worse by a vicious cycle of increased speech struggle, more negative listener reactions, heightened shame, and an intense desire to avoid and hide stuttering. Peers who witness bullying are traumatized as well. They are often afraid to report bullying and may in fact participate in the bullying18 for fear of being the next victim. They also tend to show more respectful behaviour toward children who bully.18 Although many children would like to intervene,8 few do so. When given strategies, the peer group can be a powerful ally in the work to stop and prevent bullying. Are some children more likely than others to be bullied? There is no definitive "victim" profile or stereotype. A wide variety of children are bullied, but children who are anxious and insecure, less socially confident, have a combination of aggressive and anxious reaction patterns, or are different in some way may be more at risk. 1,19 What about the children who bully? Children who bully also need help, for they are at risk for criminality, delinquency and substance abuse.1 However, not all children who bully will go down that path and it is important not to stereotype them. Among other things, a typical "ringleader" in bullying will likely be of average popularity, have a tendency to be lower in empathy, have a capacity to manipulate or intimidate others, and have a positive attitude toward coercion.19 Firstly, we must look at how the environment reinforces bullying and our roles in that environment.
Recently Andrew Mellor (personal communication, 2003) made the following important point " we must seek to create a variety of opportunities for children to talk about sensitive matters: we must strengthen our relationship of trust with them so that when they have a serious problem talking to an adult about that problem will be the natural thing to do."
Thirdly, work must be done at the whole school level, and indeed at the community level. There are many resources that focus on systemic change, some of which are referenced below. In our work with children who stutter we have taken a broad-based approach.
In addition, we have undertaken a broad student education initiative to change attitudes toward bullying and children who stutter. A classroom bullying awareness and prevention resource called Teasing and Bullying: Unacceptable Behaviour (TAB)20 was developed.
What are some guiding principles of intervention to manage teasing and bullying? In working with children it is important to consider the following principles of intervention:
Children need to understand the difference between tattling (or dobbing as it is called in some countries) and responsible reporting. The following was drawn from Pepler (personal communication, 1999), work with teachers during the field testing of TAB,20 and discussion with other colleagues in the field of bullying.
It may be that a change in terminology is needed. Rather than use the term "reporting," perhaps we should be using the term "action" and stress that it is important for children to talk with an adult if they are concerned about bullying, whether or not they are the child being bullied. Perhaps the following could replace that which was suggested above:
Perhaps this changed terminology and the focus on "talking" will help to alleviate the fear and stigma associated with reporting. How can I facilitate discussion to learn what children are thinking, feeling, and doing about teasing and bullying? Following are some ideas that can be used to facilitate discussions with children individually and in groups:
"Ignore it." It is important to emphasize that ignoring the incident of teasing or not giving a reaction may be the most helpful thing to do at that moment, but "ignore it" does NOT mean that the child should not tell anyone about the bullying. Children should continue to talk with an adult and keep talking until they get some help and support. Thus to "ignore it," as we talk about the strategy, is an active decision based on good judgment.
Making a comeback or saying something witty or unexpected back will be appropriate for some children but not others. It may work in some situations for some children who can carry it off - in other situations and for other children making a comeback may make the problem worse. If this strategy is encouraged, have the child practice what to say and how to say it to be effective. Again, using humour can be effective if the child can carry it off. However, the child must not use humour in a self denigrating way. At the end of this article is a compilation of commonly suggested strategies found in the literature. What are some general conflict resolution strategies? In developing TAB20 the following conflict resolution strategies were drawn and adapted with permission from the Grace Contrino Abrams Peace Education Foundation Inc. Some are applicable to teasing and bullying, and some are not.
Teachers report that this strategy provides a common language that facilitates the process of problem solving.
Unfortunately, as we know, there are no definitive answers and there is no one way to deal with bullying. As said earlier, each bullying event will require a different plan of action. In dealing with an acute bullying problem, parents are encouraged to:
If adult intervention is not required, decide with the child which strategy will be used and practise it. If adult intervention is necessary, parents are encouraged first to go to school personnel rather than the parents of the child who is bullying. First going to the parents of the child who is bullying can result in a worsening of the problem. With the child who is being victimized and school personnel, decide on a plan of action that protects the child from retribution. What is the very basic thing that we all can do? In closing, I think we all have a role to play, whether or not we have children and whether or not we are teachers, or other professionals working with children. Being a good role model and creating a relationship of trust with the children are at the very core of that role. Respect for ourselves and for each other is fundamental! We are the children's most important resource. Bully Free Classroom. Beane, Allan L. (1999). MN: Free Spirit Publishing Inc. Bullying and the Dysfluent Child in Primary School. British Stammering Association (in conjunction with the Psychology Department of Sheffield University). Bully-Proofing your School.
Garrity, C., Jens, K., Porter, W., Sager, N., & Short-Camili, C.
L.(1994). Longmont, CO: Sopris West. Focus on Bullying: A prevention program for elementary school communities. Available from B.C. Safe School Centre, 5325 Kincaid Street, Burnaby, B.C., Canada, V5G 1W2. P.E.A.C.E. Pack: A programme for reducing bullying in our schools, 3rd Edition. Slee, P. T. Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. Shared Concern Method. www.pikas.se/scm Teasing and Bullying: Unacceptable Behaviour (TAB). Langevin, M. (2000). Available from the Institute for Stuttering Treatment & Research, 3rd Floor, 8220 - 114 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2P4. Website: www.tab.ualberta.ca Tackling Bullying in Your School: A Practical Handbook for Teachers. (1994). Sharp, S., & Smith, P. K. London: Routledge. Websites: www.bullying.org,
www.antibullying.net, www.bullyingnoway.com.au
Suggestions for children
Suggestions for parents
1 Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. 2 Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Making a difference in bullying (On-line). Available: www.yorku.ca/research/lamarsh/articles.htm 3 Rigby, K. (2002). New perspectives on bullying. PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd.
5 Tattum, D. P. (1989). Violence and aggression in schools. In D. P. Tattum & D. A. Lane (Eds.), Bullying in Schools (pp. 7-19). Stoke-on Trent: Trentham Books. 6 Rigby, K. (1996). Bullying in schools: And what to do about it. Victoria, Melbourne: The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd. 7 Garrity, C., Jens, K., Porter, W., Sager, N., & Short-Camilli, C. (1994). Bully-proofing your school. Longmont, CO: Sopris West. 8 Charach, A., Pepler, D., & Ziegler, S. (1995). Bullying at school: A Canadian perspective. Education Canada (Spring, 1995). 9 Langevin, M. (1998). Teasing and Bullying: Unacceptable Behaviour: Field testing report - September 1998. Unpublished report, available from the Institute for Stuttering Treatment & Research, 3rd Floor, 8220 - 114 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2P4. 10 O'Moore, A.M., & Hillery, B. (1989). Bullying in Dublin schools. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 10, 426-441. 11 Rigby, K., & Slee, P.T. (1995). The peer relations questionnaire. Adelaide: Institute of Social Research. University of South Australia. 13 Mellor, A. (2003). School bullying - Problems and answers. Paper presented at "The best years of our life or are they? conference, National Coalition Against Bullying Melbourne, Australia. 14 Langevin, M., Bortnick, K., Hammer, T., & Wiebe, E. (1998). Teasing/Bullying Experienced by Children who Stutter: Toward Development of a Questionnaire. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 25, 12-24. 15 Hugh-Jones, S., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Self-reports of short- and long-term effects of bullying on children who stammer. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 141-158. 16 Neary, A., & Joseph, S. (1994). Peer victimization and its relationship to self-concept and depression among school girls. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(1), 183-186. 17 Callagahan, S., & Joseph, S. (1995). Self-concept and peer victimization among school children. Personality & Individual Differences, 18(1), 161-163. 18 Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. (1995). Peer processes in bullying and victimization: An observational study. Exceptionality Education Canada, 5(3 & 4), 81-95. 19 McGrath. (2003). Bullying in Workplaces and Schools. Keynote address presented at "The best years of our life or are they?" conference, National Coalition Against Bullying, Melbourne, Australia. 20 Langevin, M. (2000). Teasing and Bullying: Unacceptable Behaviour. Available from the Institute for Stuttering Treatment & Research, 3rd Floor, 8220 - 114 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2P4. 21 Langevin, M. & Hagler, P. (in press). Development of a scale to measure peer attitudes toward children who stutter. In A.K. Bothe (Ed.), Evidence-based treatment of stuttering: Empirical issues and clinical implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 22 Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1993). Children's attitudes towards victims. In D. P. Tattum (Ed.) Understanding and managing bullying, (pp.119-135). Melbourne: Heinemann. 23 Zarzour, K. (1994). Battling the school yard bully. Toronto, Canada: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd. 24 Berry, J. (1984). Lets talk about being bullied. Danbury: CT: Grolier Enterprises Inc. 25 McCoy, Elin. (1992). Bully-proof your
child. Reader's Digest, Nov., 199-204. |